My latest TRUMP WATCH piece, just published on Impakter, this is the opening:
Has Trump lost touch? In a single minute, on 25 May, before leaving to give the commencement speech at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, he managed to fire four tweets about Spygate. That's the term he uses to talk about the FBI informant that supposedly "infiltrated" his campaign in 2016.
"Worse than Watergate!" Trump had tweeted a few days ago. But this time, it was a long statement, 190 words long, very unusual for Trump. So it had to be broken up to fit into Twitter’s framework.
Summarizing the four tweets, here is what he said: Spygate is a "monster story" but the "corrupt Mainstream Media hates" it (meaning it won't share it); the "Informant" was "paid a fortune" (sic, how can he judge that?); and he was set up "way earlier than the Russian Hoax" began (not true).
Then he pretends to be horrified: "Can anyone even imagine having Spies placed in a competing campaign, by the people and party in absolute power, for the sole purpose of political advantage and gain?" Obviously not the case in a democracy like the U.S.
Yet that gives him the opportunity to chuckle, despite spending "far more money" than he did, the Democrats "LOST!" (in capital letters). Then he refers to what a Fox News journalist said (always Fox News, not part of the Corrupt Media):
...
Read the rest on Impakter, click here.
Has Trump lost touch? In a single minute, on 25 May, before leaving to give the commencement speech at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, he managed to fire four tweets about Spygate. That's the term he uses to talk about the FBI informant that supposedly "infiltrated" his campaign in 2016.
"Worse than Watergate!" Trump had tweeted a few days ago. But this time, it was a long statement, 190 words long, very unusual for Trump. So it had to be broken up to fit into Twitter’s framework.
Summarizing the four tweets, here is what he said: Spygate is a "monster story" but the "corrupt Mainstream Media hates" it (meaning it won't share it); the "Informant" was "paid a fortune" (sic, how can he judge that?); and he was set up "way earlier than the Russian Hoax" began (not true).
Then he pretends to be horrified: "Can anyone even imagine having Spies placed in a competing campaign, by the people and party in absolute power, for the sole purpose of political advantage and gain?" Obviously not the case in a democracy like the U.S.
Yet that gives him the opportunity to chuckle, despite spending "far more money" than he did, the Democrats "LOST!" (in capital letters). Then he refers to what a Fox News journalist said (always Fox News, not part of the Corrupt Media):
...
Read the rest on Impakter, click here.
Comments