Violence in America: Why its Political Class Bears the Brunt

Gabrielle Giffords, Democratic nominee and gen...Image via Wikipedia
Everything in the USA tends to be bigger than elsewhere in the developed world, from skyscrapers to violence. The recent shooting in Arizona of  Democrat Rep, Gabrielle Giffords, that left her clinging to life - the bullet travelled through her brain - and killed six people, including a child (9 years old) and a Federal judge, is a case in point.

The blogosphere and the media immediately went a-twitter: this was so much better than Wikileaks! Of course, Arizona is a state awash with anti-immigrant and anti-government passions, so assigning the blame to the political right was a no-brainer. The fact that she's a pretty, 40 year-old woman, wife of an astronaut and Navy captain, added to the unholy glitter of the news.

Politicians jumped on the bandwagon of comments: starting with the local county sherif (a Democrat) raging about "the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on this country", a direct result, as he saw it, of Republican Tea Party rants against the government, all the way to President Obama who immediately condemned the shooting and said "we're going to get to the bottom of this and we're going to get through with this".

The bottom seems to be rather shallow: for the moment, the culprit, already arrested, is an unbalanced young man who'd been putting threatening messages on YouTube. But he might have had an accomplice and things could get more complicated. Local law enforcement authoricities believe Giffords was specifically targetted.

Reactions in the political world in Washington have been fairly uniform. Beyond expressions of sorrow, Democrats have fairly uniformly pointed the finger to "inflammatory rethoric that incites political violence". Republicans have vigorously denied the accusation but some among them have admitted that it amounts to a "cautionary tale".

Cautionaury? Indeed! We're back to the usual formula: violence + politics= social unrest. By the way, that's a formula you can read both ways: from left to right and from right to left. Definitely America is going through a very, very difficult period. The Great Recession is hardly over, unemployment has given no sign of improvement for the last 19 months. Even the news that unemployment went from 9.8% to 9.4% last month didn't bring smiles on anyone's lips, since it was clearly not near enough to solve the problem. Economists and various other pundits had hoped for the creation of 200,000 new jobs when in fact (depending on how you crunch the statistics) probably some 50,000 were created - way below what's needed just to mop up the people who've been laid off in the past 6 months. And let's not talk about the chances of the thousands of new, young college graduates out there, trying to land their first job...

From our standpoint in Europe, it is always surprising to see how violent America gets. One can sympathize with the glum climate in the US - things are not any better on this side of the Atlantic: indeed, on the unemployment front, especially in Southern Europe, they are much worse. Unemployment can reach 40, even 50 percent among certain segments of the population, particularly the young. And the kind of job on offer, mostly in services (like for example, call centres or washing dishes) are definite downers, especially for the hopeful young with a university degree.

But political violence in Europe tends to be expressed in street protests and near-riots, burning cars and breaking up shop windows, rather than political killings like in the US.We all remember the ghastly and spectacular shooting of President Kennedy in 1963. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that only Democrats get shot. President Reagan was also subject to attack. It's just that America is a trigger-happy country, all the more so that it is the only democracy in the world with such liberal gun laws.

How about considering a tightening of gun laws? I'd love to know how my American readers feel about this. That issue so far, in the first hours and days following the shooting, remarkably, has hardly come up, either in official comments, the media or the blogosphere. With a rare exception, like Keith Olbermann who aired a special session on TV to condemn "violence in democracy" and called on Americans to "put their guns down". While a highly commendable stand, it is still clearly rethorical. What is needed is a call to legislative action to curb the reach of the gun laws. If anyone has made that call, I haven't seen it. Please tell me I'm wrong and that the issue IS coming up!

Interestingly enough, Gabrielle Giffords, like most Americans, was not in favour of cutting back on the gun laws. For some unfathomable reason, Americans see toting a gun around as part of their fundamental citizen rights. If she ever recovers from her wounds and makes it back in political life (something I fervently wish for her sake), I wonder how she'll feel about her country's gun laws...
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

In Italia abbiamo un popolo di cacciatori ovvero chasseurs de casquettes che si sparano uno con l'altro ogni apertura di caccia. Già perchè l'idea sarebbe quella di copiare i Re Francesi che quando si muovevano per i loro castelli di "riposo" avevano il problema di riempire la pancia a tutta la corte. E allora li cinghiali, lepri e cervi una strage. Ma in Italia solo i mafiosi hanno il diritto ad uccidere e a conservare una lupara in casa. Porto d'armi abusivo! Ma pensate a cosa si devono inventare i nostri carabinieri per il fermo dei delinquenti.
Per noi comuni mortali che abbiamo ereditato vecchie pistole o fucili o spade la legge prevede la auto denuncia per collezionismo o il porto d'armi per tiro sportivo alla pistola . Praticamente un cow-boy castrato.Vaglialo a spiegare agli americani! Francesco Landolina.
You're absolutely right, dear Francesco: Italy stands poles apart from America on this point, with only the Mafia freely handling guns and shooting people (mostly judges). The average Italian citizen can't even shoot in self-defence! Surely, it would be possible to find a half-way house?
In nessuno dei due casi la legge è fatta dai politici per venire in contro alla protezione dei cittadini "giusti" ma è fatta in considerazione delle aspettative di parte del proprio elettorato. In Italia è a favore delle sinistre che identificano l'arma di difesa una violazione della sicurezza dell'aggressore e del suo diritto alla vita (Battista docet) e quindi la vittima, che rappresenta la difesa della "proprietà", è la parte più debole contrattualmente nei confronti della Stato che dovrebbe rappresentarla.
Negli Stati Uniti le due parti politiche si confrontano attente a non dispiacere ai potenziali elettori e non fanno la cosa giusta.
Very true. Neither in Italy nor in the United States is the law - a result of politics - made to protect citizens. It is just meant to win over votes.

In Italy, as you point out, the law, originally intended to defend everyone's safety, actually leans towards defending aggressors just as strongly as the victims because of the leftist political climate that has permeated every aspect of life in Italy for the past 40 years.

In the United States, as you say, both the Democrats and Republicans are afraid to lose votes if they try to curb the gun laws. My question is: how long will it take for the average American citizen to convince himself that the land's gun laws play a major role in all those killings?

How many more deaths are needed?
Quando gli americani guarderanno alla loro storia della conquista dei loro territori del West e della mancanza di protezione del cittadino più debole non con gli occhi di Hollywood ma con quelli della storia dei massacri di tutte le loro guerre di conquista sia politiche che economiche (anche quelle della loro speculazione finanziaria passata ed odierna e si renderanno conto che la sperequazione rende "feroci", solo allora inizieranno a pensare che che una legge sull'assistenza del cittadino non è solo quella per le pensioni o quella sanitaria ma anche quella sul divieto dei permessi di detenzione delle armi. Allora ci sarà una Democrazia compiuta. Francesco Landolina
Wow! Strong words! But I tend to agree with you: America is a long way from achieving full Democracy, and gun ownership regulation is a necessary step along with pensions and social security...